Logo image
If your P value looks too good to be true, it probably is: Communicating reproducibility and variability in cell biology
Preprint   Open access

If your P value looks too good to be true, it probably is: Communicating reproducibility and variability in cell biology

Samuel J Lord, Katrina B Velle, R. Dyche Mullins and Lillian K Fritz-Laylin
arXiv.org
12/20/2019

Abstract

Quantitative Biology - Other
J. Cell. Biol. 219 (2020) e202001064 The cell biology literature is littered with erroneously tiny P values, often the result of evaluating individual cells as independent samples. Because readers use P values and error bars to infer whether a reported difference would likely recur if the experiment were repeated, the sample size N used for statistical tests should actually be the number of times an experiment is performed, not the number of cells (or subcellular structures) analyzed across all experiments. P values calculated using the number of cells do not reflect the reproducibility of the result and are thus highly misleading. To help authors avoid this mistake, we provide examples and practical tutorials for creating figures that communicate both the cell-level variability and the experimental reproducibility.
url
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.03509View
Open

Metrics

6 Record Views

Details

Logo image