Logo image
Physical-Biological Coupling in Southern Lake Michigan: Influence of Episodic Sediment Resuspension on Phytoplankton
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Physical-Biological Coupling in Southern Lake Michigan: Influence of Episodic Sediment Resuspension on Phytoplankton

David Millie, Gary Fahnenstiel, Steven Lohrenz, Hunter Carrick, Thomas Johengen and Oscar Schofield
Aquatic ecology, Vol.37(4), pp.393-408
10/01/2003

Abstract

Lakes Particulate matter Photosynthesis Phytoplankton Plankton
The influence of episodic, sediment resuspension on phytoplankton abundance/volume and composition, the photosynthetic maximum rate (P^sup B^^sub max^) and efficiency (α^sup B^), and chlorophyll-specific growth (μ^sub Chl^) was evaluated during the spring isothermal period in southern Lake Michigan (Laurentian Great Lakes, USA). Resuspension altered the nutrient and light climate of nearshore waters; light attenuation (K^sub d^) and phosphorus concentrations corresponded (p ≤ 0.0001 and p ≤ 0.001, respectively) with concentrations of suspended particulate matter (SPM). Phytoplankton cell volume and diatom cell abundance and volume were not associated with SPM concentrations (p > 0.05). Diatom composition displayed spatial dissimilarities corresponding with resuspension (p ≤ 0.001); small centric diatoms exhibiting meroplanktonic life histories and pennate diatoms considered benthic in origin were most abundant within SPM-impacted, nearshore waters whereas taxa typically comprising assemblages in optically-clear, offshore waters and the basin-wide, spring bloom were not. Values of P^sup B^^sub max^ and α^sup B^ corresponded (p ≤ 0.0001) with both K^sub d^ coefficients and SPM concentrations, potentially reflecting increased light harvesting/utilization within impacted assemblages. However, integral production was inversely associated with K^sub d^ coefficients and SPM concentrations (p < 0.0001) and photosynthesis was light-limited (or nearly so) for most assemblages. Although μ^sub Chl^ values corresponded with K^sub d^ coefficients (p ≤ 0.05), values were quite low (x ± S.E., 0.10 ± 0.004 d^sup -1^) throughout the study. Most likely, distinct rate processes between SPM- and non-impacted assemblages reflected short-term compositional (and corresponding physiological) variations due to infusion of meroplankton and/or tributary-derived phytoplankton. Overall, resuspension appears to have little, if any, long-term impact upon the structure and function of the lake's phytoplankton.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Metrics

19 Record Views

Details

Logo image