Abstract
In the binary decision diagram–based terminal-pair network reliability analysis, the size of binary decision diagram heavily depends on the chosen edge ordering. From a theoretical point of view, finding the best ordering is an intractable task. Therefore, heuristics have been used to obtain reasonably good orderings. Among them, the breadth-first search heuristic typically outperforms other heuristics by generating smaller binary decision diagram and thus has been widely used for terminal-pair network reliability analysis. However, the performance of breadth-first search is still only vaguely understood; not much formal work has been done. In this work, we investigate the selection of high-performance root node of breadth-first search ordering for both lattice networks and de Bruijn networks. Empirical study shows that using the two terminal nodes in the terminal-pair network reliability analysis as the root node of the breadth-first search heuristic can have poor performance, and the high-performance root nodes are not randomly distributed. The relationship between the distribution pattern of high-performance root nodes and the rearrangement of successors is also studied. Given that there is often a variation of several orders of magnitude between the sizes of binary decision diagram built using different root nodes for the same network, the application of our results can dramatically reduce the running time and memory usage and make the binary decision diagram–based reliability analysis of large-scale regular networks possible.